Direction on increasing allowable heights for Downtown development; staff recommend Scenario 4, using FAA guidelines on a case-by-case basis for Downtown building heights
3/1/19 NEW LETTERS FROM PUBLIC – 4 NEW MEMOS on 2/22/19 – Four memos from aviation consultants Landrum & Brown provide the work products on their study on airspace and development capacity. These memo provide extensive detailed background information. For example, the “Case Studies” memo gives examples of other U.S. cities like Miami that have address airspace and development capacity challenges; the “Existing Conditions” provides a summary of airport runway configurations, historical weather trends and airline operations/fleet mix at San José International Airport (SJC) as well as assessing its competitiveness compared to regional airports.
Original item: Staff will present a completed Downtown Airspace and Development Capacity Study. Staff recommends that the Council select Scenario 4, which means the City would use the Federal Aviation Administration’s obstruction evaluations to determine building height limits in Downtown Core and Diridon Station Area on a project-by-project basis. To facilitate this new process, they recommend modifying elements of the development review process, e.g. having a civil engineer prepare technical data on the FAA submittal forms identifying the location and elevation of the highest points of the building. They recommend additional planning-related items, such as developing a construction crane policy for the Downtown and Diridon Station areas as well as amending the General Plan to accommodate these changes.
Finally, staff recommends the City explore establishing a “Community Air Service Support Fund” to mitigate the financial impacts to airlines of these new changes.
The Airport Director has also issued a supplemental memo responding to the Airport Commission’s criticism of the proposed height increases.
Where: San Jose City Council
When: March 12, 2019, 1:30pm
Link to item: https://sanjose.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3872301&GUID=DBFA85DA-637C-43A4-9DD6-924926FB06C9
Link to agenda: https://sanjose.legistar.com/DepartmentDetail.aspx?ID=21676&GUID=ACCCCFF5-F14A-4E1A-8540-9065F45A8A90
Council Priority Setting
NEW SUPPLEMENTAL MEMO + LETTERS FROM THE PUBLIC –
The supplemental memo clarifies that four nominations be moved to the greenlight list: reducing gun violence, reducing ADU permit costs and streamlining the permit process, developing an ADU Plan Book, and aligning General and Zoning in parcels where they currently do not agree. For the latter item, staff recommends that just Phase II of that process be referred to the budget process.
Letters from the public include 2 letters from building trades affiliated organizations (South Bay Piping Labor Mgmt Trust and NorCal Mechanical Contractors Association) supporting the Wage Theft Prevention Ordinance; two letters from environmental advocates, and one from SVO detailing its policy recommendations for the priority-setting session. Its three biggest priorities are: a universal development fee, incentive programs to promote childcare and early ed facilities, and exploring and comparing CEQA policies across municipalities,
Original item: Council will approve and rank items on the Council Priority List.
Council will remove the following priorities from the existing list and add to the nominations list: Spurring High Density Development Along Transit Corridors (#23), Riparian Corridors and Bird Safe Design (#24), and San Jose is Open for Business/Legal Non-Conforming Uses (#26).
Council will remove 4 priorities from the list as complete: Update the City’s Rental Rights and Referrals Program (previously priority #1); Housing Rehabilitation Program (previously #4); Personal Care Business Compliance Initiative (#10); Downtown Active Storefronts Initiative (#25); Medical Marijuana (#27).
Where: San Jose City Council
When: March 5, 2019, 1:30pm
Link to item: https://sanjose.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3865380&GUID=FAC8B6D6-B599-47C3-9E17-F28983DA140A
Link to agenda: https://sanjose.legistar.com/MeetingDetail.aspx?ID=661115&GUID=BDC1A86E-D186-4CDD-B299-4EFDA4585B3D&Options=info&Search=
Special Council Meeting to interview for 1 Planning Commission, 4 Ethics Commission seats
This Special Meeting will take place on March 18, 2019 in order to interview and select candidates for one vacancy on the Planning Commission (term ending Jun 2022) and three vacancies on the Ethics Commission / Board of Fair Campaign and Political Practices (one term ending Mar 2021 and 3 terms ending Mar 2023).
Where: San Jose Rules & Open Government Committee
When: March 6, 2019, 2pm
Link to item: https://sanjose.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3874440&GUID=2E2D8402-7C07-4094-A619-1303C18089D7
Link to agenda: https://sanjose.legistar.com/DepartmentDetail.aspx?ID=36262&GUID=C61F4090-B945-4162-94EC-A504FDB7035D&R=f39f46a4-9b22-4281-9163-6bf4c00c1bef
Council will hear two items together: the status report on the deferred maintenance and infrastructure backlog, deferred from Feb 26, as well as a report on the status of pavement maintenance programs and funding.
New item, 3.8: The City’s 2,434 mile pavement network is rated overall in “Fair” condition with an average pavement Condition Index (PCI) rating of 66 on a scale of 0-100, with 100 being a new street. For the first time in well over a decade, the pavement maintenance program is projected to be fully funded for the 2020 construction season (FY 2019-20). The improvements in the projected pavement condition can be primarily attributed to the passage by San Jose voters of Measure T. Looking ahead, the City has a 10-year average funding level adequate to improve the average citywide PCI, and staff will continue to seek additional funding sources at the federal, state and local levels to close the $14.8 million gap needed to fully restore the street network to “good” condition.
Original Item 3.7, from Feb 26: This status report provides updates on the City’s Deferred Maintenance and Infrastructure Backlog and near-term strategies to minimize increases to the backlog. The backlog for 2019 totals roughly $1.5B in unfunded costs with an additional $86.9M needed to maintain the City’s infrastructure. Transportation infrastructure continues to have the largest unfunded needs.
The passage of Measure T, the Disaster Preparedness, Public Safety, and Infrastructure Bond Measure, ensures that $300M of funding will be allocated to repair an estimated 388 miles of local streets in the worst condition starting in 2020. This investment will reduce the street backlog to approximately $600M (from $1.1B) by 2020. Other funding from Measure T is subject to Council approval. Priorities for Measure T funding are: $20M to repair and replace several bridges; $20M to convert outdoor lights to LED, and $35M to construct Storm System Conveyance and Flood Prevention Projects.
Where: San Jose City Council
When: March 12, 2019, 1:30pm
Link to item: https://sanjose.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3871645&GUID=F80B7D93-F6E7-4941-988E-5EF0574B0261
Link to agenda: https://sanjose.legistar.com/DepartmentDetail.aspx?ID=21676&GUID=ACCCCFF5-F14A-4E1A-8540-9065F45A8A90
Recommendations to increase Downtown retail vibrancy include corporate cafeteria restriction
The firm Strategic Economics completed a Downtown San Jose Retail
Strategy report which analyzed existing conditions in San Jose Downtown and provides 11 strategy recommendations to increase the area’s vibrancy including catering better to smaller retailers, building the pedestrian routes between notable destinations like the SAP Center, and ensuring there are more daily needs retailers available.
Of note among the strategy recommendations are strategy #8, on “quality of life” which includes “manag[ing] the homeless population away from the initial areas targeted for implementation of these
recommendations” and strategy #11: “Consider Adopting a Policy Regarding Corporate Cafeterias,” which raises the idea of restricting internal corporate cafeterias.
Where: San Jose City Council
When: March 12, 2019, 1:30pm
Link to item: https://sanjose.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3871633&GUID=CE4BB113-181A-4F8B-9D26-0AD97F5B71F0
Link to agenda: https://sanjose.legistar.com/DepartmentDetail.aspx?ID=21676&GUID=ACCCCFF5-F14A-4E1A-8540-9065F45A8A90
Commissioning nexus and feasibility studies for a Commercial Linkage Fee
A 2/18/19 memo from City Staff (Housing Department, City Manager’s Office and OED) recommends that the City hire a consultant for $150,000 to conduct a nexus study (examines the impact of commercial development on the need for affordable housing and provides evidence of
a reasonable relationship between the need for affordable housing and the type of development) and a feasibility study (assesses the effect of a fee on the feasibility of commercial development) for a Commercial Linkage Fee and return to the City Council to present the results of those studies and provide a recommendation to the Council on the establishment of a Commercial Linkage Fee.
The Commercial Linkage Fee is a potential source of funding as San Jose seeks
to meet its goal of constructing 10,000 affordable units by 2022.
The proposed timeline for the studies estimates June 2020 as the date that consultants would report back to Council with a recommendation.
Where: San Jose City Council
When: March 12, 2019, 1:30pm
Link to item: https://sanjose.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3871634&GUID=761DDC92-6A9B-4A7E-8E91-330D71F20153
Link to agenda: https://sanjose.legistar.com/DepartmentDetail.aspx?ID=21676&GUID=ACCCCFF5-F14A-4E1A-8540-9065F45A8A90
City of Cupertino
Direction on Cities Association housing policy paper
The council will discuss and possibly accept a housing policy statement from the Cities Association of Santa Clara County that critiques the CASA Compact and urges the MTC, ABAG and State Legislature to work with small and medium-sized cities to craft details of upcoming housing policies to avoid a “one-size fits all” approach.
The statement includes these key points:
- Supporting legislation that will provide voters statewide with the opportunity to apply a 55 percent threshold for investments in affordable housing and housing production.
- Supporting legislation that will return e-commerce/internet sales tax revenue to the point of sale – not the point of distribution as currently mandated – to provide cities that have a significant residential base with a commensurate fiscal stimulus for new housing.
- Supporting other new funding sources dedicated to housing, including endorsing Governor Newsom’s approach of major new incentive packages for local communities
- Support for Governor Newsom’s call to the private sector to invest significant contributions into housing, but opposing any effort to take away or redistribute property tax or other existing local revenues from cities as a way to generate new funding for housing
- Support for establishing tenant protections as cities deem appropriate for their residents
- Removal of regulatory barriers to building new accessory dwelling units and incentives for their production as well as thoughtful CEQA reform to streamline the permitting process.
- (NEW) Support for significant increases in transportation investment that provide real transit solutions at 10-15 minutes headways in communities where increased housing is being planned for and built and to connect those communities with job growth centers.
- (NEW) Opposing the RHNA Subregion idea. Should a governance structure be needed to administer new affordable housing funds and monitor housing production, designating ABAG to fulfill this role rather than establishing yet another agency.
Where: Cupertino City Council
When: Tuesday, March 5, 2019, 6pm
Link to item: https://cupertino.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3872264&GUID=AD4601C9-A8F4-4A62-880C-7420497B8FE9&Options=&Search=
Link to agenda: https://cupertino.legistar.com/MeetingDetail.aspx?ID=655491&GUID=F69F169D-9462-415C-9F3A-DF8320E58A28&Options=info&Search=
Adopting affordable housing residential in-lieu fee and impact fee for non-residential development
Staff recommend that council adopt a resolution establishing residential and non-residential affordable housing fees. The City is proposing to charge two types of fees: 1) a residential in-lieu fee that could be paid by a developer in lieu of building affordable rental or ownership housing units on-site as part of new development; and 2) an impact fee for non-residential developments.
The proposed residential in-lieu fee for ownership single family development and ownership townhome development is $33 per square foot based on the findings and recommendations in the Nexus Study’s on-site compliance cost. For ownership condominium development, staff recommends that the City charge a residential in-lieu fee comparable to the fee for rental housing at $20 per square foot. The residential in-lieu fee for rental housing is proposed to be $20 per square foot.
Staff proposes a phased approach for non-residential development. The City would charge an initial non-residential impact fee of $3/SF for commercial development and $1/SF for office, R&D, industrial and warehouse development. Additionally, staff proposes that the nonresidential impact fee increase every year for the next two years in $2/SF, per year increments for commercial development until the impact fee reaches $7/SF, while the fee for office, R&D, industrial and warehouse development would increase by $1/SF, per year increments until the impact fee reaches $3/SF. Thereafter both fees would be adjusted each fiscal year in accordance with the provisions in the Affordable Housing Ordinance.
As specified in the Affordable Housing Ordinance, all monies from the fees shall be used or committed to use by the City for the purpose of providing very-low, low and moderate income housing in the City. These funds are typically reinvested to promote new affordable housing development in the community, for example, in the form of a development loan to a developer building affordable housing.
Where: Milpitas City Council
When: Tuesday, March 5, 7pm
Link to agenda: http://www.ci.milpitas.ca.gov/_pdfs/council/2019/030519/Agenda.pdf
Link to packet: http://www.ci.milpitas.ca.gov/_pdfs/council/2019/030519/package.pdf
Direction on amending Downtown Precise Plan
Council will provide direction about whether to amend the Downtown Precise Plan, and if so, whether to conduct an overhaul of the plan or focus on topics that have been raised as potential areas for study—parking, land use, design, historical preservation. Staff will then return to council with a scope and workplan.
Parking issues include:
The entire Plan area is comprised of approximately 25 percent residential land uses and 75 percent commercial land uses. New office developments have been a growing trend within the Plan area and the City has reviewed many recent requests for new office developments. Council has raised the question as to what is the appropriate mix of uses in the Plan area and whether the Plan should limit the amount and location of additional office and restaurant uses in an effort to draw other uses to the downtown area.
Land Use issues include:
Where: Mountain View City Council
When: Tuesday, March 5, 2019, 5pm
Link to item: https://mountainview.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3874482&GUID=E6506019-289D-4932-8B43-6A9A6F48818A&Options=&Search=
Link to agenda: https://mountainview.legistar.com/MeetingDetail.aspx?ID=655803&GUID=5C0B7641-0436-4FE1-82CB-0DB80FBEB48E&Options=info&Search=
Staff recommend that council introduce an amended Park Land Dedication Ordinance that provides a credit for publicly accessible private open space in the North Bayshore Precise Area Plan. The second reading of the ordinance would be set for March 26, 2019.
The Park Land Dedication Ordinance requires residential developments to dedicate a certain amount of park land, or pay an In-Lieu Fee, based on the net-new, market-rate units. Prior council discussions have addressed the increased costs of land and construction as well as development requirements and local school strategies that have impacted the feasibility of residential development in the North Bayshore. At the October 23, 2018 meeting, the City Council provided direction to staff to draft an amendment to allow a “Publicly Accessible Private Open Space” credit that only applies to residential developments in the North Bayshore Precise Plan area.
The Park Land Dedication Ordinance currently provides an option for a maximum credit of 50 percent of the value of the land for private open space. At the direction of council, staff has drafted an amendment that creates a maximum credit of up to 75 percent of the value of the land devoted to publicly accessible private open space.
Where: Mountain View City Council
When: Tuesday, March 5, 2019, 5pm
Link to item: https://mountainview.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3874485&GUID=67E1C7CF-A423-4676-92F7-6E4B4DFA9CE2&Options=&Search=
Link to agenda: https://mountainview.legistar.com/MeetingDetail.aspx?ID=655803&GUID=5C0B7641-0436-4FE1-82CB-0DB80FBEB48E&Options=info&Search=
Direction on Cities Association housing policy paper
Council will provide input on the draft Position Paper for the Cities Association of Santa Clara County regarding the CASA Housing Compact. The Vice Mayor, who is chair of the CASCC Legislative Action Committee and helped to revise the paper, is asking for further input from council members to incorporate into the final document.
The statement critiques the CASA Compact and urges the MTC, ABAG and State Legislature to work with small and medium-sized cities to craft details of upcoming housing policies to avoid a “one-size fits all” approach. The statement includes these key points:
Where: Mountain View City Council
When: Tuesday, March 5, 2019, 5pm
Link to item: https://mountainview.legistar.com/MeetingDetail.aspx?ID=655803&GUID=5C0B7641-0436-4FE1-82CB-0DB80FBEB48E&Options=info&Search=
Link to agenda: https://mountainview.legistar.com/MeetingDetail.aspx?ID=655803&GUID=5C0B7641-0436-4FE1-82CB-0DB80FBEB48E&Options=info&Search=
Direction on land use preferences for Terra Bella Visioning Plan
Council will provide direction on a preferred land use and next steps for the
Terra Bella Visioning and Guiding Principles Plan.
The Plan is an effort to gather community input and develop a vision and strategies for the Terra Bella Area, which was not included in the 2030 General Plan update process. Council was supportive of the addition of residential land uses in the Plan area, and envisions a higher-intensity residential neighborhood with greater retail services, the addition of open space, and improved multi-modal improvements and connections throughout.
The project team has refined the land use alternatives based on input from council, the Environmental Planning Commission, and the public. The major refinements include creating additional mixed-use areas and incorporating neighborhood transition strategies to reduce potential impacts of new development on existing single-family home areas.
Council is asked to provide direction on which land use vision alternative is preferred for Terra Bella, and whether council would like to create a new Terra Bella Precise Plan for FY 2019-20 as the next step following the adoption of the Vision Plan. Staff will continue preparing the Draft Vision Plan, with anticipated public release in spring 2019. Final adoption of the Plan is anticipated before the summer 2019 Council break.
Where: Mountain View City Council
When: Tuesday, March 5, 2019, 5pm
Link to item: https://mountainview.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3874483&GUID=3DDB0A0B-40AD-441B-8B6A-14DA09476B78&Options=&Search=
Link to agenda: https://mountainview.legistar.com/MeetingDetail.aspx?ID=655803&GUID=5C0B7641-0436-4FE1-82CB-0DB80FBEB48E&Options=info&Search=
Eliminating Architectural Committee review & replacing with admin hearing process; changing membership of Arch. Committee; streamlining the appeals process
Staff recommend that council direct staff to prepare an ordinance to replace the existing Architectural Committee process with an alternate Administrative Level Hearing Process. The goals of this change are to address potential due process conflicts for Planning Commissioners, establishing clearer policy guidance for appeals, streamlining the review process for non-controversial projects, eliminating double appeals and utilizing standard public hearings practices.
The Santa Clara Architectural Committee (AC) acts as the review body for new land use development projects not otherwise subject to Planning Commission or City Council review or other proceedings established within the City Code. Projects typically considered by the AC include additions to single-family residences and new construction within commercial and industrial districts. The City Code currently provides that the AC be composed of one member appointed by the City Council and two members of the Planning Commission appointed by the Chair of the Commission. In recent years the City Council has appointed a member of the council to serve on the AC along with the two Planning Commissioners.
Where: Santa Clara City Council
When: Tuesday, March 5, 2019, 4pm
Link to item: https://santaclara.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3875996&GUID=F26F4B14-3659-40A5-8BD7-B081540B8EEF&Options=&Search=
Link to agenda: https://santaclara.legistar.com/MeetingDetail.aspx?ID=640621&GUID=606861EE-8C8A-46BB-A3FD-0AB401CA1AEA&Options=info&Search=
Santa Clara County Board of Education
Report of Rocketship Financial Audit
Charter Schools are required to submit their annual fiscal audits to the California Department of Education (CDE), the State Controller, and their respective County Superintendent of Schools by December 15th every year.
On December 14, 2018, Rocketship Public Schools requested an extension to submit its audit for 2017-18. It again requested extensions on January 10, 2019, and January 25, 2019. On January 29, 2019, SCCOE sent a Notice of Concern to Rocketship Mateo Sheedy, Sí Se Puede, Discovery Prep, Alma Academy, Brilliant Minds, Rising Stars, Fuerza, and Los Sueños charter schools due to Rocketship’s failure to timely submit their annual financial audits by December 15, 2018. In those letters, SCCOE requested further information and clarification as to the reasons for delay and how Rocketship planned to solve this problem for the future by February 15, 2019.
Rocketship submitted its completed audit on February 4, 2019, to the CDE, the State Controller, and SCCOE. On February 11, 2019, the CDE requested additional information and clarification from Rocketship regarding the audit findings resolutions contained in the 2017-18 audit. On February 14, 2019, Rocketship also responded to SCCOE’s Notice of Concern. During the February 20, 2019, Board Meeting an update was provided to the SCCBOE regarding the status of the Rocketship Audit and additional information was requested. This information item is in response to that request.
Where: Santa Clara County Board of Education
When: March 6, 5pm, 1290 Ridder Park Drive, San Jose, CA 95131
Link to item: http://www.boarddocs.com/ca/sccoe/Board.nsf/goto?open&id=B9UAH981AAEE
Link to agenda: https://www.boarddocs.com/ca/sccoe/Board.nsf/Public
Extend timeline to fill vacancy on Mt. Pleasant School District Board
A vacancy occurred on the Mt. Pleasant School District Board due to the election of Peter Ortiz to the Santa Clara County Board of Education. Pursuant to Education Code Section 5091 the Mt. Pleasant School Board had 60 days from the date of the vacancy to appoint or order an election to fill the vacancy; the Mt. Pleasant Board failed to do so. Due to the Board’s failure to appoint or order an election, the County Superintendent must order an election to fill the vacancy at the next regularly scheduled election on November 5, 2019.
In order to avoid the cost of an election and provide the Mt. Pleasant School Board additional time to appoint a Board member, the County Superintendent is requesting that the Santa Clara County Board of Education request a waiver of a portion of Education Code Section 5091 to extend the timeline for appointment by the Mt. Pleasant School Board to July 15, 2019 with the understanding that if they fail to appoint, the election for November 5, 2019 stands.
Where: Santa Clara County Board of Education
When: March 6, 5pm, 1290 Ridder Park Drive, San Jose, CA 95131
Link to item: http://www.boarddocs.com/ca/sccoe/Board.nsf/goto?open&id=B9TTQS758F0C
Link to agenda: https://www.boarddocs.com/ca/sccoe/Board.nsf/Public
Approve ENA with Republic/Swenson/EAH for 300-unit residential development at the Blossom Hill light rail station
The board will consider approving an Exclusive Negotiation Agreement with Green Republic Blossom Hill LLC ( a joint venture of Republic Urban, Swenson, and EAH Housing ) for a proposed development at the Blossom Hill Light Rail station. The proposal from the Joint Venture calls for 300 new rental residential units and 12,580 square feet of retail space, plus 382 spaces of new shared project parking. Sixty-eight (22.5%) of the apartments would be affordable rentals, and 232 would be market-rate units. GRBH (the joint venture) proposes a ground lease with a term of 65 years.
The 232 market-rate units and approximately 10,000 square feet of commercial space are proposed for a single building owned and developed by a 50-50 partnership comprising Republic Urban and Swenson. The proposed 68 affordable units would be in a connecting building with approximately 2,850 square feet of commercial space owned and developed by EAH Housing. Within the affordable apartment building, 10% of the units would be for families earning up to 30% of Area Median Income (Extremely Low Income); the remaining apartments would be for families earning up to 50% of Area Median Income (Very Low Income).
Where: VTA Board of Directors
When: Thursday, March 7, 2019 5:30 PM Board of Supervisors’ Chambers County Government Center 70 West Hedding Street San Jose, CA 95110
Link to agenda: http://vtaorgcontent.s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/Site_Content/bod_030719_packet.pdf
Foothill-De Anza Community College District
Transition from At-Large to Trustee-Area Based Elections in 2022
On January 30, 2019, the district received a written demand letter from Sebastian Aguilar, through his attorney, threatening the filing of a California Voting Rights Act (CVRA) lawsuit against the district unless the governing board declares its intent to change from at-large elections to trustee-area elections. Mr. Aguilar’s letter alleges that racially polarized voting has occurred both in District trustee elections and in non-trustee elections involving voters who reside in the District.
California school districts and other public agencies have seen an increasing number of CVRA demands and lawsuits. The district is not aware of any public agency that has successfully defended a CVRA challenge to date. If Mr. Aguilar were to file a CVRA lawsuit and prevail, the district would be liable for Mr. Aguilar’s costs and attorneys’ fees, which could exceed $1 million, in addition to its own attorneys’ fees.
The plaintiff may file a lawsuit 45 days after presentation of a written demand to transition to trustee area elections, unless that demand is met. If a resolution of intent is adopted, the CVRA caps the district’s costs at $30,000. The 45-day interval applicable to Mr. Aguilar’s demand will expire on March 18, 2019.
Mr. Aguilar has offered a resolution of his claim, which would allow the district to defer creation of trustee areas until the data from the 2020 decennial federal census is available to use for that purpose and defer implementation of trustee area elections until the November 2022 general election, which would avoid duplicative expense to the district.
Where: Foothill-De Anza Community College District
When: Monday 6:00 p.m., March 4, Foothill College Toyon Room (Room 2020), 12345 El Monte Road, Los Altos Hills, CA 94022
Link to item: http://www.boarddocs.com/ca/fhda/Board.nsf/goto?open&id=B9PJE311689A
Link to agenda: https://www.boarddocs.com/ca/fhda/Board.nsf/Public
Do you have a news tip you would like to share? Would you like to contribute to The Left Hook? Email us at LeftHookBlog@gmail.com
No Comments