Policy Watch: Week of 4/3

City of San Jose

Creating new “office/R&D” development categories to reduce construction tax for applicants; new memo recommends further lowering proposed total tax rate from 2.5 to 2%

Since presenting the item to the Community and Economic Development Committee on January 23, 2017, staff has obtained additional feedback from the development community and conducted additional analysis of the fiscal implications of a single “office” use category at alternative rates. In addition, as requested by Committee staff is providing additional analysis regarding the City Manager’s authority to approve required refunds.

The revised staff recommendation is for a combined tax rate of 2.0% for office uses, rather than the 2.5% previously proposed. In addition, staff are now recommending that data centers be considered industrial and receive a 1% rate rather than the higher office rate.  This would result in an estimated reduction of approx. $1.7 million annual to for transportation funding/General Fund as compared to the original staff proposal. (Staff did not provide an estimated fiscal impact of either proposal compared to a scenario of no tax suspensions.)

Revised recommendation: Approve an ordinance to:

(a) Amend Title 4 of the San Jose Municipal Code to extend the expiration of the temporary partial suspension for “office, research and development” and “data center” uses (SJMC 4.46.039.10 and SJMC 4.47.095) from March 31, 2017, to March 31, 2019.

(b) Amend Title 4 of the San Jose Municipal Code to create a temporary partial suspension from the Commercial-Residential-Mobilehome Park Building Tax (SJMC 4.47), beginning April 1, 2019, from 3% to 0.5% for the following uses:

  1. Office, General Business (SJMC 20.200.813)
  2. Office, Research and Development (SJMC 20.200.818)

To allow the City Council the flexibility to review the uses included and verify that these sectors are being accurately represented, this provision shall sunset March 31, 2024.

(c) Amend Title 4 of the San Jose Municipal Code to suspend the Commercial-Residential- Mobilehome Park Building Tax (SJMC 4.47), and create a temporary partial suspension of the Building and Structures Construction Tax (SJMC 4.46), beginning April 1, 2019, to achieve a rate of 1% for Data Center uses as defined by SJMC 20.200.265, including a provision that this suspension shall sunset March 31, 2024.

(d) Amend Title 4 of the San Jose Municipal Code to amend section 4.82.320 to authorize the City Manager or designee to compromise or settle tax refund claims for amounts exceeding fifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00) and up to five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000.00), with the written approval of the City Attorney.

Where:   San Jose City Council

When:   Tues. April 4, 2017, 1:30pm, Chambers

Link to original memo:   http://sanjose.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=&event_id=2678&meta_id=625338

Link to sup memo:  http://sanjose.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=&event_id=2678&meta_id=626689

Link to agenda:  http://sanjose.granicus.com/GeneratedAgendaViewer.php?event_id=c2e76267-47c0-42aa-ab43-cd6eb3b37b89    

 

Audit of Office of Equality Assurance concludes additional resources are needed for increased workload with OTW and Min Wage

Accept the audit of the Office of Equality Assurance (OEA). The OEA implements, monitors, and administers the City’s wage policies in addition to overseeing disadvantaged business enterprise (DBE) program responsibilities and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliance coordination. Because OEA has had its workload increase and may see further increases, reevaluation of the resources dedicated to these responsibilities is needed.

Due to inadequate staffing and the need for staff to spend most of their time manually verifying payrolls submitted, there is very little staff time spent conducting site visits or other monitoring and enforcement activities in the field. Automating wage calculations through a software solution such as LCPTracker could free up some staff time.

The audit concluded the following findings:

Finding 1: Reallocation of Resources Can Help Ensure the Success of All Aspects of the Labor Compliance Program.

Finding 2: Documenting Policies and Procedures Can Ensure Continuity and Consistency.

Finding 3: Resource Constraints May Limit Future Contractor Outreach and the Local Hire/Apprentice Utilization Programs.

Audit response memo from Barry Ng indicates that the Administration concurs with the majority of the Auditor’s recommendations. Six recommendations are categorized as “green” and three are categorized as “yellow.”

Where: San Jose City Council

When:  Tues. April 11, 2017, 1:30pm, Chambers

Link to item:  http://sanjose.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=&event_id=2679&meta_id=626669

Link to audit response:  http://sanjose.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=&event_id=2679&meta_id=626671

Link to agenda: http://sanjose.granicus.com/GeneratedAgendaViewer.php?event_id=09bf25d0-576d-49a6-8d6d-3b985eae98f2

 

Report back regarding Roosevelt Park and Little Portugal Urban Village Implementation Chapters, including feedback from additional outreach to developers

The supplemental memorandum from Planning Director addresses concerns from the December 13, 2016, City Council public hearing, where the Administration removed the General Plan Text Amendment for the Roosevelt Park and Little Portugal Urban Village Implementation Chapters from the agenda, citing the need for additional outreach to developers. Staff has undertaken additional work in response to comments received from various stakeholders, including SPUR and the development community. On March 10, 2017, staff presented the two Implementation Chapters (which are substantially identical) at the Developers’ Roundtable to obtain input. The development community had the opportunity to review the previous drafts of the Implementation Chapters, as they were part of the Planning Commission and City Council packets available online. The updated Implementation Chapters for the Roosevelt Park and Little Portugal Urban Village Plans are attached to this memorandum.

Changes to the Implementation Chapters include the following:

  • Inclusion of guiding principles to provide more clarity about the process for securing Urban Village Amenities.
  • Removal of the requirement that 75 percent of the planned commercial capacity must be built prior to any residential mixed-use projects being considered or approved by the City. This requirement was not replaced with an alternative requirement.
  • Removal of Implementation Actions 2 and 5, which were:
    • Implementation Action 2: Propose a Director initiated rezoning of properties within the Roosevelt Park/Little Portugal Urban Village that will codify the design goals and policies of this Plan and will implement its Urban Design goal,
    • Implementation Action 5: Develop a Development Agreement template for the Roosevelt Park/Little Portugal Urban Village that would provide the development community with more clarity on the development agreement process and the level of contributions that would be sought by the City through the negotiation process.
  • Addition of a privately-owned and maintained art as an Urban Village Amenity.
  • Minor grammatical and formatting corrections.

Where: San Jose City Council

When: Tues. April 11, 2017, 6:00pm, Chambers

Link to item:  http://sanjose.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?view_id=&event_id=2679&meta_id=626691

Link to agenda: http://sanjose.granicus.com/GeneratedAgendaViewer.php?event_id=09bf25d0-576d-49a6-8d6d-3b985eae98f2

 

City of Gilroy

Update on Comparative Analysis for Gilroy High-Speed Rail Station Area Plan

Staff will be providing Council with an update on the Comparative Analysis report being prepared by PlaceWorks regarding 2 location options being considered by the High-Speed Rail Authority for the Gilroy Station Area Plan. BAE Urban Economics will serve as a sub consultant to PlaceWorks and prepare the economic portion of the assessment. The findings of the report will be presented to the City Council at its May 15, 2017 meeting.

The comparative analysis will evaluate both the aerial and embankment options being considered by the High-Speed Rail Authority for the tracks running Downtown and the embankment configuration being considered for the east-side alignment. The analysis will consider the effects of these alignment options within the City’s sphere of influence – extending from Masten Ave on the north to the Pajaro River on the south. It will also include the effects of the proposed station and the maintenance facility proposed south of either station location. The analysis will address all relevant factors included in the CEQA Guidelines as well as other relevant topics.

The High-Speed Rail Authority now intends to identify its preferred alignment for consideration in the EIR/EIS tentatively by August of this year. The draft EIR/EIS will be completed and distributed for public review by November. Certification of the EIR/EIS and selection of the alignment to be constructed will likely occur in 2018. The identification of properties impacted by construction will occur after certification of the EIR/EIS. Any additional information regarding construction that becomes available will be included in the report to Council in May.

Where: Gilroy City Council

When: April 3, 2017, 6:00pm

Link to item: http://www.cityofgilroy.org/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Item/2386?fileID=6030

Link to agenda: http://www.cityofgilroy.org/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Item/2369?fileID=6018

City of Mountain View

Interviewing new candidates for CSFRA Rental Housing Committee

Staff are recommending that Council conduct interviews with new applicants for the Rental Housing Committee, and provide direction to staff regarding preferred candidates and next steps of the selection process. After completing one round of applications, Council elected to open a new round of applications and will be interviewing a total of eight new applicants at this meeting, including:

  • Michael Hovish
  • Keith Ellis
  • Karen Willis
  • Steven Johnson
  • Bryan Danforth
  • Vanessa Honey
  • Marcell Ortutay
  • Izzie Tiffany

The Community Stabilization and Fair Rent Act (“CSFRA”) was adopted by voters on November 8, 2016 to regulate rent increases and to provide just-cause eviction provisions. The effective date of the CSFRA is currently suspended due to a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO). While the TRO remains in effect, \ the City Council cannot appoint the Rental Housing Committee (RHC). However, City staff has continued its preparations to implement the CSFRA, including the process to interview candidates for the RHC. The hearing on the preliminary injunction is currently scheduled for April 4, 2017. No decision is expected that day. If the Court denies the preliminary injunction, the CSFRA would become effective and the City Council could then appoint the RHC, which it may wish to do so expeditiously to allow the RHC to begin the implementation of the CSFRA.

Where: Mountain View City Council

When: April 4, 2017, 5:00pm

Link to item: https://mountainview.legistar.com/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3010533&GUID=69762FAD-FF3C-4028-B5BC-BA6BEC75DB97&Options=&Search=

Link to agenda: https://mountainview.legistar.com/View.ashx?M=A&ID=538448&GUID=422EC0F4-FBF2-4AFE-BAF6-5D3F037A2448

 

City of Santa Clara

Receiving presentation by JLL Hotels & Hospitality Group on operating models for Santa Clara Convention Center

Council will be receiving a presentation and report by Dan Fenton of JLL Hotels & Hospitality Group regarding operating models for the Santa Clara Convention Center, as a follow-up to the February 16, 2017 presentation made by Jones Lang LaSalle America’s, Inc. (JLL) to the Economic Development Committee. JLL was retained by the City to provide an overview of the potential organizational models which may be considered for the Santa Clara Convention Center.

As a follow up to the overview of operating models, at the April 11, 2017 Council study session, the Santa Clara Convention and Visitors Bureau will be discussed. At its April 27, 2017 meeting, the Economic Development Committee will continue to discuss potential operating models for the Santa Clara Convention Center and seek input from key stakeholders. Work efforts of the Economic Development Committee regarding the Convention Center will be reported back to the full Council.

Where: Santa Clara City Council

When: April 4, 2017, 5:00pm

Link to item: http://sireweb.santaclaraca.gov/sirepub/agdocs.aspx?doctype=agenda&itemid=58816

Link to agenda: http://sireweb.santaclaraca.gov/sirepub/mtgviewer.aspx?meetid=1975&doctype=AGENDA

2nd reading to adopt Worker Retention Ordinance for food service and building service workers

Staff are recommending that Council adopt Ordinance No. 1964 establishing a Worker Retention Ordinance for Food and Building Service Workers in the City of Santa Clara. If finally adopted, this ordinance shall become effective 30 days from the date of adoption, which will be May 4, 2017. The proposed ordinance is modeled after similar worker protection ordinances in the cities of San Francisco, Los Angeles and San Diego. Santa Clara’s proposed ordinance would do the following:

  • apply to any entity in the City of Santa Clara with more than 25 employees or convention venues with a capacity of at least 8,000, with active contracts in excess of $25,000 with a term of 3 months or longer for regularly scheduled building and food services;
  • cover full or part time employees (8 hours a week or more) whose regular place of work is in the City of Santa Clara during the 90 days prior to ta contract transition, excluding managerial, supervisory, or confidential employees;
  • require contractors to provide a list of workers no less than 15 days before terminating a food service or building service contract to successor contractor;
  • require successor contractor to retain employees of terminated contract for a 90-day transition period, during which workers’ work shift and place of work could not be substantially changed, and workers could not be terminated except for cause and if successor contractor determines that fewer workers are required to perform services – in which case the successor contractor would retain employees by seniority within job classification;
  • require successor contract to complete a performance evaluation for each employee at the end of the 90-day transition period, at which point employees with satisfactory performance would be offered continued employment.

A violation of the Ordinance can be enforced as a civil action in court. The remedies include: back pay, treble damages for intentional violations, injunctive relief and costs and attorneys’ fees.

Where: Santa Clara City Council

When: April 4, 2017, 7:00pm

Link to item: http://sireweb.santaclaraca.gov/sirepub/agdocs.aspx?doctype=agenda&itemid=58837

Link to agenda: http://sireweb.santaclaraca.gov/sirepub/mtgviewer.aspx?meetid=1975&doctype=AGENDA

 

Receiving report on community outreach regarding alternatives for updating citywide minimum wage ordinance for regional consistency

Staff are recommending that Council receive a report on the initiation of community outreach to evaluate stakeholder feedback on an update to the City’s minimum wage ordinance for regional consistency, and direct City Manager to return to Council at a future study session meeting to seek direction from Council on the specifics of a minimum wage proposal for community outreach.

At its February 16, 2017 meeting, the Economic Development Committee discussed the City’s minimum wage ordinance and the possibility of re-examining the City’s current ordinance to follow regional efforts to reach a minimum wage of $15 per hour. The Committee recommended that staff provide Council with research gathered by the Cities Association of Santa Clara County (Cities Association) and that the Council consider initiating outreach to stakeholders for an amendment to the City of Santa Clara’s minimum wage ordinance to be consistent with a regional approach to reach $15 per hour.

Staff is seeking direction from the Council on three potential approaches to the City’s local minimum wage ordinance:

  • Option 1: Consider a schedule similar to that of Milpitas and join neighboring cities, as highlighted above, beginning January 1,2018.
  • $12.00 by January 1,2018
  • $13.50 by July 1, 2018
  • $15.00 by January 1, 2019
  • Option 2: Consider an alternative two-step schedule:
    • $13.00 by January 1, 2018
    • $15.00 by January 1, 2019
  • Option 3: Continue Santa Clara’s existing minimum wage ordinance and align with the State’s minimum wage rate beginning in 2019 or 2020.

Should Council decide to commence community outreach regarding modifying Santa Clara’s minimum wage ordinance to join the regional minimum wage effort to reach $15 per hour by 2019, staff is prepared to implement a 90-day outreach plan that will include preparation of outreach materials, distribution of surveys through social media, the City’s minimum wage web page, mailers to city registered businesses, use of the City’s minimum wage email for feedback, and collaboration with the Santa Clara Chamber of Commerce in hosting community engagement forums. Results of the community outreach and a draft ordinance would be brought back to the Council for consideration in summer 2017.

Where: Santa Clara City Council

When: April 4, 2017, 7:00pm

Link to item: http://sireweb.santaclaraca.gov/sirepub/agdocs.aspx?doctype=agenda&itemid=58841

Link to agenda: http://sireweb.santaclaraca.gov/sirepub/mtgviewer.aspx?meetid=1975&doctype=AGENDA

 

Consenting to Service Agreement with Landmark Event Services for security services at Levi’s Stadium for a period of 5 years with one 2-year extension

Staff are recommending that the Stadium Authority adopt a resolution consenting to a Service Agreement between Forty Niners Stadium Management Company and Landmark Event Services for security services at Levi’s Stadium for a period of 5 years, with one 2-year extension, and note and file a first amendment to include the Stadium Authority as additional insured under the insurance requirements of the Service Agreement.

Landmark is a Bay Area-based company with a track record serving venues such as Candlestick Park, Oakland Coliseum, Oracle Arena, New Orleans Superdome, Stanford University and currently Levi’s Stadium. At the Stadium Authority’s request an Amendment has been included to add the Stadium Authority as additional insured. The contract with Landmark is based on an hourly schedule on a per event basis for both StadCo for NFL events and Stadium Authority for non-NFL events. StadCo will be responsible to ManagementCo for costs associated with NFL events. The costs for non-NFL event services are borne either by the event promoter or by the revenue generated from the event.

Landmark staffing rates are as follows for 2017-2018:

  • Event Manager: $35.90/hour
  • Supervisor: $33.70/hour
  • Off Duty Officer: $47.80/hour
  • Usher, Ticket Taker, Parking Security/Flagger/Attendant, Event Security: $30.47/hour

Additional costs:

* Shifts more than 8 hours but less than 12 hour, bill rate increase by $1/hr

* Shifts more than 12 hours, bill rate

increase by 2x base rate

* Holiday rates = 1.5x regular rate

* Base rate increase by 50% on holidays

Where: Santa Clara City Council

When: April 4, 2017, 7:00pm

Link to item: http://sireweb.santaclaraca.gov/sirepub/agdocs.aspx?doctype=agenda&itemid=58842

Link to agenda: http://sireweb.santaclaraca.gov/sirepub/mtgviewer.aspx?meetid=1975&doctype=AGENDA

 

Consenting to Service Agreement with ABM Industry Groups for janitorial services at Levi’s Stadium for a period of 5 years with one 2-year extension

Staff are recommending that the Authority adopt a resolution consenting to a Service Agreement between Forty Niners Stadium Management Company and ABM Industry Groups for janitorial services at Levi’s Stadium for a period of 5 years with one 2-year extension, and note and file an amendment to include the Stadium Authority as additional insured under the insurance requirements of the Service Agreement. At the Stadium Authority’s request an Amendment has been executed to add the Stadium Authority as additional insured. With the exception of event staffing costs (which are allocated on an event by event basis), costs associated with general custodial maintenance of the Stadium and other day-to-day services are allocated as part of the shared Stadium expenses. Responsibilities for shared expenses are allocated to both StadCo and the Stadium Authority.

Approval of the recommended action would provide the Stadium Manager with the requisite consent authority to enter into the contract for service. Per the Stadium Authority Procurement Policy 17.30, Stadium Authority consent is required as the cost of the contract will be in excess of $250,000. The contract with ABM is based on an hourly schedule for both StadCo for NFL events and the Stadium Authority for non-NFL events. The costs for non-NFL event services are borne either by the event promoter or by the revenue generated from the event. Costs associated with day-today maintenance and janitorial services under this Agreement are allocated as part of the shared Stadium expenses.

ABM staffing rates for 2017-2018 include:

  • Supervisor: $32.48/hour
  • Lead/Event Coordinator: $31.65/hour
  • Window & Pressure Washers: $24.32/hour
  • Utility and Compactor Room: $24.32/hour
  • Parking Lot Picker: $23.28/hour
  • Suite/Club Staff: $22.56/hour
  • Sweeper/Restroom/Trash: $19.57/hour
  • On Site Manager: $71.52/hour
  • Assistant Manager: $46.25/hour
  • Day Porter/General Cleaner: $17.78/hour

Where: Santa Clara City Council

When: April 4, 2017, 7:00pm

Link to item: http://sireweb.santaclaraca.gov/sirepub/agdocs.aspx?doctype=agenda&itemid=58843

Link to agenda: http://sireweb.santaclaraca.gov/sirepub/mtgviewer.aspx?meetid=1975&doctype=AGENDA

CUSD

Superintendent to be released from employment; Board will review questions for Executive Search Firm Interviews

The board made a decision to fire Superintendent Gudalewicz after two years on the job. The decision came after a controversial move by the Superintendent to fire all staff in an elementary school and controversial issues like potential teacher housing on school site. The Superintendent will finish the school year by June 30th. The district is now in the process of finding a replacement.

Where:  CUSD

When:  04/04, 6:00pm at CUSD

Link to agenda packethttps://www.cusdk8.org/Page/274.

 

VTA

Selecting Republic/Core as developer for ENA for Tamien Station project 

Authorize the General Manager to enter into an Exclusive Negotiations Agreement (ENA) with Republic Tamien LLC (a Joint Venture of Republic Urban Properties and The Core Companies) for negotiation of the proposed terms and conditions of a Joint Development Agreement for a Joint Development project at the Tamien Station. If agreement cannot be reached with Republic Tamien LLC during the ENA term, authorize the General Manager to enter into an ENA with ROEM Development Corporation.

Joint Development is mixed-use, mixed-income Transit Oriented Development pursuant to Federal Transit Administration Joint Development Circular requirements. The three Joint Development program goals listed by priority in the Policy can be summarized as: (1) generate a long-term stable source of revenues for VTA; (2) create high-quality transit-oriented development that achieves highest and best use and provides affordable housing; and (3) create development that generates ridership growth and/or enhances VTA assets. Amendments by the Board of Directors to the Joint Development Policy in 2016 established a comprehensive affordable housing policy, with a goal for 35% of all residential units to be affordable when the portfolio is built out, and a minimum requirement for each project to provide at least 20% affordable units. It also established a goal for community workforce opportunities in projects.

In 2016, VTA completed a two-year effort when the San Jose City Council rezoned the approximately seven acre Tamien Station Joint Development site to allow up to 440 dwelling units, with up to 3,000 square feet of commercial space. The approval also included a City goal to increase the commercial space to up to 10,000 square feet in order to allow a new childcare center (the existing Bright Horizons childcare center at the Tamien Station will move to a new location in the area). VTA sold an additional 3.5 acres of land at Tamien Station to the City of San Jose for creation of a long-desired neighborhood park and construction has already commenced. Through a separate action, VTA completed environmental clearance for a replacement parking structure that will replace all of the existing parking spaces in the Tamien Park and Ride lot that will be the site of the Joint Development project.

On September 27, 2016, VTA initiated an RFP selection process for the Tamien Station. VTA received two proposals by the deadline of January 20, 2017: one from Republic Tamien LLC, a Joint Venture of Republic Urban Properties and The Core Companies (Republic Tamien); and the other from ROEM Development Corporation (ROEM).

The panel determined that both the Republic Tamien and ROEM proposals have the potential for successful negotiation of a Joint Development Agreement that accomplishes Joint Development Policy goals. The panel’s consensus finding is that the Republic Tamien proposal is overall superior for the following reasons:

– Greater Proceeds to VTA. The Republic Tamien proposal is projected to generate for VTA over the term of the ground lease $49.7 million in cash payments (current dollars), versus $25.5 million from the ROEM proposal (a comparison for Net Present Value is1 $8.5 million from Republic Tamien and $5 million from ROEM).

– Higher Quality Residential Development. The Republic Tamien proposal calls for construction of podium buildings for both affordable and market-rate residential. Podium construction results in a courtyard and residential construction on a podium above parking.

By comparison, the ROEM proposal calls for a podium building for the affordable units, however it uses wrap buildings for the market-rate units. Wrap buildings involve residential units built around an interior parking structure, and does not create as desirable residential units, which could affect long-term rental revenue growth and VTA’s share of proceeds.

– Less Risk for Replacement Parking Structure Development. The Republic Tamien proposal calls for a parking structure with an estimated cost of $23 million, and a design with the potential for adaptive reuse to another use if future parking demand decreases. This estimate is consistent with the projected cost anticipated by VTA’s parking engineer. The ROEM proposal provides an allowance of $13 million for the replacement parking structure, with VTA responsible for any cost overruns (this figure is based on shifting the first 20 years of ground rent payments to the parking structure budget). ROEM’s estimated cost is approximately two-thirds of the cost typically incurred by developers for parking structures, and while ROEM makes an argument for how its vertically integrated design-build approach can significantly lower costs, the low cost and lack of ROEM’s commitment to build the structure irrespective of actual cost results in a substantial risk to VTA.

– Meets Affordable Housing Requirement. The Republic Core proposal calls for 20 percent of the residential units to be affordable units meeting the RFP’s minimum requirement. By comparison, ROEM proposes a higher level of affordable housing at 30 percent of residential units and ROEM’s proposal is superior in this regard. The community member who served on the evaluation panel concurred while emphasizing the importance of VTA maximizing affordable housing production at Tamien station.

The evaluation panel made recommendations for how the Republic Tamien proposal could be improved that could serve as a basis for VTA’s negotiation objectives during the ENA period. For the Republic Tamien proposal the negotiation objectives would include but are not limited to: (a) move construction of affordable housing to the first phase of residential development; (b) consider enhancing the provision of affordable housing as well as deeper affordability pursuant to the Joint Development Policy goal; and (c) revise and condense the phasing of development to reduce community impacts and shorten the overall project timeline.

Following the Board’s approval of a developer for an ENA, VTA will commence negotiations with the selected developer on the terms and conditions of a Joint Development Agreement and a long-term ground lease. The Joint Development Agreement will set forth contractual terms and conditions to be met by both parties, including contingencies for design and entitlement approvals, permit requirements, financing commitments, and other conditions that would need to be satisfied before VTA executes a ground lease agreement. VTA staff will submit the proposed Joint Development Agreement to the Board of Directors for review and approval once negotiations have been completed, and request authorization for the General Manager to sign the Agreement.

Where: VTA Board of Directors

When: April 6, 2017; 5:30 pm

Link to packet: http://vtaorgcontent.s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/Site_Content/bod_040617_packet_.pdf

Total Views: 407 ,


Do you have a news tip you would like to share? Would you like to contribute to The Left Hook? Email us at LeftHookBlog@gmail.com

No Comments

Leave a Comment

Follow

Get every new post on this blog delivered to your Inbox.

Join other followers: